imeanforever: (i ~ collection)
Alisyrrabel | "Promise" ([personal profile] imeanforever) wrote in [community profile] alicornutopia2016-01-20 02:45 pm

blood sweat tear

He's moving her to a different court to see if it'll improve her attitude. She's allowed to fly. It's been a long, long time since she was allowed to -

She is only allowed to fly to her destination, not anywhere else. She notices that she is not where she should be, that she cannot progress to where she was told to go, and she careens out of control when her wings won't flap anymore, and she crashes.

---

with Miles (kappa)

with Minus (kappa)
thisvorlunatic: (⑪ theoretical)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic 2016-02-02 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
"That would be nice. I'm also wondering if it's possible to go a hundred times this high and set up a station with air onboard - if all the paired gates go through areas of thin atmosphere, then it seems like it would be uncomfortable to pass through them, and it's worth thinking about that sort of thing if you plan on selling lots and lots of gates. The obvious downside of course is that you'd need people to maintain the station, and I have no idea how easy it is to actually keep a station afloat above an infinite plane of ground... I suppose going a very long distance down from the surface is also an option. Do you know what's underneath Fairyland, if anything?"
thisvorlunatic: (⑨ obstacles)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic 2016-02-02 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
"We can test the discomfort thing, I suppose. ...If it's, er, ground all the way down, I'm now wondering what would happen if you opened a gate to a hundred light-years below the surface, or something like that. What if anything does happen when one end of a gate opens into the middle of a solid object?"
thisvorlunatic: (⑥ ivan)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic 2016-02-02 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
"I can think of some ways around that, depending exactly how it works. ...There admittedly might not be a huge practical gain from carving out a tunnel complex a hundred light-years under the surface of Fairyland, but it would be really cool."
thisvorlunatic: (⑪ theoretical)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic 2016-02-02 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
"If you have a limited willingness to open gates I'd prefer not to spend it on things that don't gain me anything but fun and don't gain you anything at all. On the other hand, if we could build a tunnel complex a hundred light-years under the surface of Fairyland - or some other, even more outrageously huge distance - I feel like that would potentially be a more practical place to put your gatepairs, or even just to put a - a sort of orbital transfer station, a gate transfer complex I guess, where people could come in one gate and go out another of their choosing, at vastly reduced risk since I know for sure no mortals are going to successfully tunnel through a hundred light-years of dirt looking for fairies."

He shrugs. "I don't know, what do you think? If fairies someday invent more advanced forms of flight, and there are open gatepairs hanging out in the sky above all of Fairyland's nicest landmarks, someone's going to stumble through them for sure and then your mortal customers' descendants are in trouble. A hundred light-years of dirt is a much more effective obstacle."
thisvorlunatic: (⑪ theoretical)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic 2016-02-02 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
"Yeah, if that works then it eliminates the concern about fairies stumbling through the gates and the only thing left is the convenience of not having to quadruple-layer every gate. If someone wanders into the mortal world and finds that they can cast there, that's a pretty big problem all by itself and I wouldn't be particularly worried about them gating into the hub in particular... to be honest, if someone wanders in the mortal world my two main worries are that they might take a fancy to conquer the galaxy and end up starting a huge war, or that they might end up under the control of a mortal who, in turn, takes a fancy to conquer the galaxy and ends up starting a huge war. Our gate hub wouldn't have much effect on either scenario."
thisvorlunatic: (⑪ theoretical)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic 2016-02-02 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
"...well. That... would definitely change things, yes. But - once you have the Queen, how do you propose to keep her?"
thisvorlunatic: (⑨ obstacles)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic 2016-02-02 04:39 am (UTC)(link)
"I mean, if having control of the Queen confers control over every fairy, then the sort of people who think conquering the galaxy is a good idea are going to want to get their hands on the Queen, and if they can't do that, some might be motivated to try to destroy her instead. This seems like an inherently fragile situation."
thisvorlunatic: (⑫ complexities)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic 2016-02-02 05:06 am (UTC)(link)
"Standard mortal defensive tactics have no argument whatsoever against standard mortal offensive tactics plus gates, assuming the attacker doesn't want the defender in any state more precise than 'probably vaporized'. How well do standard fairy defensive tactics hold up against..."

He frowns in thought for a moment, then goes on,

"I'm having trouble summarizing all of mortal weaponry in a single sentence, but the images that loom largest in my mind are the gravitic imploder lance and the electron orbital randomizer. Um, approximately, 'everything in the path of this weapon is briefly made thousands of times heavier relative to inconvenient new definitions of down' and 'everything in the path of this weapon turns into immense amounts of fire'. As opposed to merely being set on immense amounts of fire, which is accomplished by a different and much less terrifying device. Mortal defensive tactics have very effective ways to guard against both of these which require interposing a shield between the source of the weapon and the thing being protected."
thisvorlunatic: (⑨ obstacles)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic 2016-02-02 05:17 am (UTC)(link)
"Yeah. We do have the first-mover advantage, and that's not to be discounted, but... I'm torn between wanting everyone to know about the names problem so they can protect future generations of mortals, and wanting no one to know about the names problem so I don't wake up one morning to find some paranoid individual has gotten hold of a gate-capable fairy and started invading every planet they can find a holo of. I hadn't realized until just now how much of the stability of human relations is maintained by the inability of people to travel from point to arbitrary point without passing through the intervening space... but I know how much it would benefit people to be able to stroll casually between star systems, so denying everyone gates forever seems like the wrong answer. I don't know."
thisvorlunatic: (⑮ mountains)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic 2016-02-02 05:20 am (UTC)(link)
"Anything we do, including 'nothing', might conceivably lead to the wrong person getting their hands on the wrong magical or technological advantage and starting one or more huge wars," he sighs. "This is not a good situation to be in."
thisvorlunatic: (⑪ theoretical)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic 2016-02-02 05:36 am (UTC)(link)
"Looking at things from as unbiased a perspective as I can manage... my planet is probably one of the better ones you could have landed on, and I'm probably one of the better people," he says. "The second-best place I can think of... has a historical problem with trying to conquer other planets to add to their eight-planet empire, but I've met their Empress and she's as sensible and levelheaded a person as you could ask for; if you got in with her you'd be all right. I'm thinking about this because with the stakes as high as they are, I want to be sure you have access to the best possible resources even if that means recommending you set up shop with a rival political entity."

(no subject)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic - 2016-02-02 06:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic - 2016-02-02 06:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic - 2016-02-02 07:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic - 2016-02-02 07:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic - 2016-02-02 07:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic - 2016-02-02 07:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic - 2016-02-02 07:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic - 2016-02-02 17:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic - 2016-02-02 18:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] thisvorlunatic - 2016-02-02 18:15 (UTC) - Expand