from_scratch: (Default)
Campbell Mark Swan ([personal profile] from_scratch) wrote in [community profile] alicornutopia2014-05-31 03:51 pm

call me maybe

Cam is out flying. There's a decent cloud of atmosphere around the gold plane, now, millenia of demons making air around themselves for comfort and not sealing it up because why would you bother. There's a small forest, here - the effect is kind of ruined by the lamps it has to grow under, but it's still pretty.

He feels an open summons and lets it grab him -

with the Joker (kappa)

with Ripper (kappa)

with Darren (Aestrix)

with Minus (kappa)

with Emma (Marri)

with Facility 3141592 (armokGoB)

with the admin (kappa)

with Jarvis (kappa, Aestrix)

with Miles (kappa)

with Hank (Nemo)
neverbeatme: Laughing, friendly and cheerful. (ℂ the capacity for humour)

[personal profile] neverbeatme 2014-06-05 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
"Also a good idea."
neverbeatme: Smug; triumphant. (ℕ attend my victory)

[personal profile] neverbeatme 2014-06-05 12:28 pm (UTC)(link)
"My demonologist also happens to be her boyfriend, so she's taking the opportunity to go visit. She'll call me when she has an answer."
neverbeatme: Smirking. (ℂ a quiet contentment)

[personal profile] neverbeatme 2014-06-05 03:25 pm (UTC)(link)
"Just a little," she agrees.
neverbeatme: Smug; triumphant. (ℕ attend my victory)

[personal profile] neverbeatme 2014-06-05 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
"Probably. It has some interesting symbology. It's still going to be most useful for spells involving you, me, and Chris, but I could see her getting some mileage out of the pen queen and the demon-angel motif."
neverbeatme: Watching you thoughtfully. (ℕ I prefer James)

[personal profile] neverbeatme 2014-06-05 03:41 pm (UTC)(link)
"It meant the physical pieces we were using were closer to the metaphor Chris wanted to build. Correspondences like that help strengthen a spell."
neverbeatme: Looking sideways, leaning forward. (ℚ await and observe)

[personal profile] neverbeatme 2014-06-05 03:52 pm (UTC)(link)
"Magic isn't that exact," she says. "Among the possible improvements are that you might get better luck out of it, it will probably hold out a little better against external attack, and you might get some extra fringe protection against things that are on the edge of the definition of 'hostile', like invasive scrying. Those are the kinds of things affected by the strength of the spell. But the only definite effect is that the spell is stronger, and stronger means it is better at its job, not that it's better at its job in any particular set of exact measurable ways we know for sure in advance. If you want a better idea, you could ask Chris, because she can probably get a good read on how the spell turned out and she'll have a better idea than I would of what the baseline is."
neverbeatme: Standing by herself in a wide open space. (ℚ but never lonely)

[personal profile] neverbeatme 2014-06-05 04:06 pm (UTC)(link)
"Okay, scrying overview... someone who has enough things to identify you with can use a scrying spell to look at what you're doing right then, or where you were in the past, or find out other information about you. Useful scrying is kind of an esoteric discipline, but someone who's really good at it could use your name and a picture of you to watch any particular few minutes of your life they felt like specifying. There are not a lot of people who are that good at it. And it's harder when, for example, your name is not that specific to you because it's one syllable that's a reasonably common nickname. It's also possible to scry specific locations instead of specific people, but that way is more fragile - it can be disrupted pretty easily if the location you're trying to look at is even a tiny bit warded, or if there's any other strong magical influences getting in the way."
neverbeatme: Looking sideways, leaning forward. (ℚ await and observe)

[personal profile] neverbeatme 2014-06-05 04:24 pm (UTC)(link)
"It could be somewhat improved. I do something like that," she says. "But if you changed to something you identify with more strongly, or that was more unique, it could just make things worse. Scrying can compensate for poor lighting conditions pretty handily, if it's a good scry. I've heard of someone who was particularly good at that kind of magic being able to find out someone's name using a photo and a glove they'd lost. Actually, now that I'm on the subject, sympathetic magic safety 101: Don't let anyone you don't trust get their hands on your blood, hair, fingernail clippings, or other miscellaneous detached body parts. Clothing that comes in pairs, like gloves or socks, if you lose one then ditch the other - burn it, if you're feeling really paranoid that day. Don't lose any objects you're strongly sentimentally attached to. Most people go through their lives just fine without paying attention to any of that except maybe the hair and fingernails, but if you're going to be making enemies who can do magic, those are the things that could make it easier for them to do magic to you."
Edited 2014-06-05 16:24 (UTC)
neverbeatme: Grinning; vastly entertained. (ℂ not unlike a smile)

[personal profile] neverbeatme 2014-06-05 04:29 pm (UTC)(link)
"James is quite possibly more real to me than the name on my birth certificate, but fewer people know it. So people trying to scry me based on the other name won't get very far, because the personal connection is more important than what somebody wrote down when you were born."
neverbeatme: Smirking. (ℂ a quiet contentment)

[personal profile] neverbeatme 2014-06-05 04:34 pm (UTC)(link)
"Anyway, your other question about scrying - the kind of information you need to specify something is a pretty squishy category. In general it corresponds roughly to the kind of information you'd need to specify it in conversation - 'So-and-so's fifth birthday', 'Sunnydale Main Street in front of the library', that kind of thing."
neverbeatme: Looking sideways, leaning forward. (ℚ await and observe)

[personal profile] neverbeatme 2014-06-05 04:42 pm (UTC)(link)
"Hmm... it's harder to specify things that way. When somebody's first birthday was is pretty much a fact, but when their most private moment was is a judgment, and probably not one that a lot of people have made, and the people who have might not agree with each other. The guideline that springs to mind is, if you had video footage of your whole life and you handed the pile over to someone who had no idea who you are and a lot of time on their hands, could they find what you're looking for based on that specification? So, 'fifth birthday' would be pretty easy, 'first kiss' would take some looking but probably not a lot of trouble, 'most private moment' would mean they'd have to go through carefully and think about it and might not be able to decide even then."
neverbeatme: Watching you thoughtfully. (ℕ I prefer James)

[personal profile] neverbeatme 2014-06-05 04:44 pm (UTC)(link)
"I have no idea, but wouldn't be inclined to rule it out without seeing someone try it and fail."

(no subject)

[personal profile] neverbeatme - 2014-06-05 16:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] neverbeatme - 2014-06-05 16:55 (UTC) - Expand